The built-in Intel Celeron B810 processor is a member of the latest Sandy Bridge family, to which the current Core i3, i5 and i7 models also belong. The Intel Celeron B810 is a rather unknown processor compared to the Core models. ( Dell 0D839N Charger )

The majority of manufacturers sooner opt for a Core i3 than the Intel Celeron for their entry level notebooks. Our database, where only one single notebook with an Intel Celeron B810 processor is listed, confirms this. The Celeron processors represent the low end of the Sandy Bridge family in both price as well as performance. ( Dell 312-0928 Charger )

Even the Intel Core i3 processors have Hyper Threading, an Intel HD 3000 Graphics and a few energy saving modes. Both cores of the Celeron B810 are clocked with 1.6 GHz and therefore approximately correspond to a 1.7-2.0 GHz Celeron from the Arrandale family. Many features of the Core models aren't implemented in the Celeron models in order to save expenses. For example, it completely lacks functions like Turbo Boost, Hyper Threading and AES. ( Dell 312-0929 Charger )

Energy saving modes may also even be disabled in a few models. Rather than integrating the Intel HD 3000 Graphics of the current Core models, the Celeron models only have the Intel HD Graphics.( Dell D837N Charger )

We use the program Cinebench, versions R10 and R11.5, to assess the processor's performance. First, we look at the Cinebench R10 single rendering (64 bit) benchmark, which only assesses one processor core. The Celeron B810 processor is at the lowest end of our chart. ( Dell H018N Charger )

A few tablet PCs could already be a threat for the HP ProBook with its 2550.0 points. The Asus Eee Slate EP121 (470UM, GMA) with an Intel Core i5-470UM is right behind the ProBook with 2524.0 points. ( Dell H028N Charger )

Just to what extent the B810' functionality and performance has been slimmed down becomes evident when it's compared with a current Intel Core i3-2310M. For example, the MSI CX 640 notebook (2310M, GT 520M) reviewed by our colleagues at Notebookcheck.pl achieves a much better rating with a score of 3319.0. ( Dell Y596M Charger )

It looks similar in the Cinebench R10 multi rendering (64 bit) benchmark. The 4330s reaches a score of 4995.0. Again, the 4330s is just before the Asus Eee Slate EP121 (470UM, GMA) with 4947.0 points. ( Dell 0F116N Charger )

Compared with an Intel Core i3 processor, the i3 is again significantly better. The Lenovo IdeaPad Z370 (2310M, Geforce 410M) achieves 7398.0 points here. We only have one other notebook with an Intel Celeron B810 processor in our database until now. ( Dell P649N Charger )

That is the HP ProBook 4530s, which was reviewed by our Polish colleagues from Notebookcheck.pl. Both notebooks are very close to each other in our benchmarks, whereby the processor in the 4530s is always a bit faster. Cinebench R10 multi rendering (64 bit) 4995.0 points (4330s) versus 5050.0 points (4530s).( Dell 02MTH3 Charger )

The processor doesn't support Turbo Boost and thus the corresponding benchmarks have to be omitted here. The processor always had its full capacity available on battery power during the tests. ( Dell 451-11469 Charger )

We use the program PCMark Vantage to assess the system's performance. Unfortunately, our Polish colleagues didn't perform this benchmark on their model. So, we don't have a direct comparison to an identical processor available. ( Dell KRJVC Charger )

As in the processor tests, the notebook is pretty much at the lower end of our benchmark chart. The system performance is everything but outstanding with the 3644.0 points it achieves. For example, the Acer Travelmate 8172T-33U4G32N (330UM, GMA) and the Lenovo Thinkpad Edge 11 (380UM, GMA) accomplish a comparable performance with 3680.0, respectively 3619.0 points. ( Dell 05Y4YV Charger )

We have to mention that both UM processors are low voltage CPUs, which are no longer up to date.( Dell 0FH4HR Charger )

The notebook doesn't do much better in a comparison with current devices. The similarly priced Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E320 (2310M, HD Graphics 3000) scores significantly better with 5457.0 points.

Nevertheless, the system's subjective performance is absolutely satisfactory despite these low rates. However, it's important to know where the notebook's limits are. For example, the notebook is perfect for editing Office documents or making presentations. ( Dell 451-11467 Charger )

On the other hand, it doesn't make much sense to edit pictures and videos with it. 2 GB of RAM may look as if it could get tight. However, it is possible to for example work in Office documents while several browser tabs are opened for doing Internet research. ( Dell 5YRYV Charger )

A memory upgrade is also fairly easy, as we described earlier. 4 GB modules are available for starting at about €20.The notebook is far from its performance limits in normal use with a processor load between 10 percent and approximately 25 percent.( Dell 9JJGJ Charger )

4.4Windows 7 Experience IndexProcessorCalculations per second5.3Memory (RAM)Memory operations per second5.5GraphicsDesktop performance for Windows Aero4.4Gaming graphics3D business and gaming graphics5.7Primary hard diskDisk data transfer rate5.9 PCMark Vantage 3644 points( Dell JKVC5 Charger )

The installed TOSHIBA MK3261GSYN hard disk is a 2.5 inch model with a (gross) capacity of 320 GB. This seems a bit low nowadays considering that many consumer notebooks are usually equipped with a hard disk capacity from 500 GB - 1 TB. ( Dell NKDWV Charger )

http://www.fiql.com/members/suiteoffic

http://lj.kraslan.ru/users/suiteoffice/

http://www.scribbld.com/users/suiteoffice/

http://suiteoffice-microsoftoffice.blogspot.com/